Testseek.dk har samlet 266 ekspertanmeldelser af AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 79%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
Juli 2015
(79%)
266 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse fra eksperter, der har anmeldt dette produkt.
Brugere
(93%)
2719 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse af ejere af produktet.
790100266
Redaktørerne kunne lide
TEST
AMD FX-8350 Wraith Edition
Hardware udlånt af
AMD
Skrevet af Michael den 30. May 2016. Testen er vist 5161 gange
Flere tests i kategorien Processor
Del med dine venner
I skrivende stund
Den 29. maj 2016
Er AMD FX-8350 Wraith Edition set med
Højere kerne hastighed
Forbedret multitread ydeevne(i forhold til bulldozer)
Abstrakt: On June 4 Intel is launching its next generation Core processors, also called Haswell. That means it's the perfect opportunity for us to retest all current processors and a number of older ones with a completely new test configuration. It will not only ...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
-
Udgivet: 2013-04-08, Forfatter: James , anmeldelse af: micromart.co.uk
Abstrakt: AMD's Piledriver line (which succeeds Bulldozer) has been attempting to pull back ground from Intel since its release, primarily through aggressive discounts. One of the few AMD chips that can even start to compete on performance grounds is this, the eigh...
Abstrakt: AMD and Intel continue serving up increasingly faster CPUs. But graphics card performance is accelerating even faster. Is there still such a thing as processor-bound gaming? We take two Radeon HD 7970s, high-end desktop CPUs, and a few games to find ou...
Abstrakt: Earlier this month we looked at the gaming performance in Windows 8 compared to Windows 7 , and it turns out there was no difference. Afterwards our loyal readers asked us to apply our expertise to the processor performance in Windows 8, to find out whe...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
-
Udgivet: 2012-11-08, Forfatter: Dave , anmeldelse af: techradar.com
Good stable overclock, Great multi, treaded performance, Good value for money
Definite clock for clock improvement over Bulldozer, Increased clock speeds whilst keeping the same TDP, Competes against the Intel Core i5 3570K in lots of tasks, Good performance for the money
High power consumption is still an issue, Single threaded performance still needs improvement, 32nm technology, Intel are on 22nm
AMD have certainly raised the game with the revised version of Bulldozer, known now as Piledriver. However, we have not seen the quoted 'up to 23%' improvement which AMD said there should be. Obviously, that is in an ideal world it may be that big of ...
Abstrakt: The first generation processors based on AMD's Bulldozer architecture did not meet expectations, so AMD is making a second attempt today, with FX 2.0 or Vishera. The Piledriver cores are a refinement and further development of Bulldozer, that are suppos...
Abstrakt: It is just over a year since AMD launched its flagship consumer CPU. Probably known to you as 'Bulldozer' and brought to market under the performance-intimating FX branding, AMD's grounds-up design, comprised of up to eight cores, generally failed to win ...
Abstrakt: Last year, AMD launched its Bulldozer architecture to disappointed enthusiasts who were hoping to see the company rise to its former glory. Today, we get an FX processor based on the Piledriver update. Does it give power users something to celebrate? A...
