Testseek.dk har samlet 21 ekspertanmeldelser af AMD FX-4130 3.8GHz Socket AM3 Plus og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 74%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for AMD FX-4130 3.8GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
(74%)
21 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse fra eksperter, der har anmeldt dette produkt.
Det har været spændende at teste AMDs nye vidunder. FX-4130 leverer en rigtig god ydelse, og set i forhold til FX-4100, er der sket lidt på ydelsesfronten. FX-4130 er ca. 10 % hurtigere overall. FX-4130 placerer sig ca. mellem FX-4100 og så A10-5800K. Hva...
Speedy for most mainstream computing tasks, Unlocked for easy overclocking
Power-hungry for a midrange CPU, Only slightly faster than the chip it's replacing
At just over $100, this four-core AMD processor is a good fit for budget PC builders and upgraders who don’t often edit large videos or do other time-consuming, CPU-heavy tasks. Note, though: It’s power-hungry for the performance it delivers. ...
Abstrakt: We've already reviewed the top processor of AMD's Vishera family, FX-8350. That was just the beginning of the big refresh for the Socket AM3+ platform. AMD has also rolled out a number of more affordable CPUs. Today we're going to cover them in compari...
Bulldozer has been a chip that has had end users a little divided for a while as it doesn't offer up blazing performance and granted this is the case, but what they do offer up is performance on a budget. The choice to refresh the existing line of FX chip...
Abstrakt: Taken from MSI's Enthusiast Gaming series, Z270 GAMING M7 presents us with triple M.2 slots, front panel USB 3.1 and top tier Z270 features!Read articleTagged as: MSI, Z270As the most accessible Ryzen 7 chip, the 1700 comes in with its 8C/16T goodness, th...
Better stock heatsink, Better idle power consumption, Overclocks better than its predecessor – FX-4100
Higher power consumption under load, Lack of L3 cache
AMD have increased the speed of their CPUs and they have added a better stock cooler, but does the lack of L3 cache affect this CPU in a negative way?In the vast majority of benchmarks which we ran, the cache certainly did not impact our results too m...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
Pris
-
Udgivet: 2013-02-11, Forfatter: Marc , anmeldelse af: hartware.de
nach diesem Test ziehen. AMD FX-4100 vs. FX-4130 - mehr Cache vs. mehr Takt. In Spielen siegt der größere Cache, in Anwendungen dagegen ist der höhere Takt von Vorteil. Aber der Unterschied zwischen beiden CPUs ist minimal. Gerade wenn man viele auf Multi...
Para mí el FX-4130, después de estos días de análisis, es un procesador a camino entre un Core i5 y un Core i3 de Intel. Un procesador de cuatro núcleos con mucha disponibilidad de recursos para el que quiera un PC ágil y una buena máquina de overclo...
Même prix que le FX-4100, Potentiel d'overclocking, Socket AM3+
Ventirad un peu bruyant, TDP plus élevé
Ce FX-4130 remplace chez AMD le FX-4100 au même prix. Malgré un TDP plus élevé et un "nouveau" ventirad maison un peu bruyant, ce processeur Bulldozer est assez intéressant pour se monter une configuration à prix abordable. Le petit boost en fréquence est...
Abstrakt: Avec un tarif proche de cent euros, on disposera d'un CPU pour socket AM3+ intégrant quatre cœurs cadencés à 3.6GHz et 3.8GHz mais aussi d'un système de refroidissement approprié.Celui du AMD FX 4100 étant différent de celui du FX 4130.On pourra donc grâc...
