Testseek.dk har samlet 49 ekspertanmeldelser af AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 69%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
(69%)
49 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse fra eksperter, der har anmeldt dette produkt.
Jeg havde store forhåbninger til en hurtig gamer CPU til små penge. Men denne CPU har ikke levet op til mine forventninger. Når den end ikke kan følge med en middelklasse CPU fra den gamle arkitektur, så er der langt til toppen. Hvis man skal nævne n...
Godkänd prestanda i prisklassen, Trivs med många trådar, Rejält utrymme för överklockning, Hårdvaruaccelererad AESkryptering
Svag prestanda vid färre trådar, Jämförelsevis hög energiförbrukning vid standardfrekvenser, Enormt hög energiförbrukning vid överklockning
När AMD Bulldozer lanserades under hösten 2011 fick processorfamiljen omgående ett skamfilat rykte. Sedan dess har dock en hel del vatten flutit under broarna, med både mjukvaruoptimeringar och prissänkningar i backspegeln. Det är förutsättningarna fö...
Abstrakt: We've already reviewed the top processor of AMD's Vishera family, FX-8350. That was just the beginning of the big refresh for the Socket AM3+ platform. AMD has also rolled out a number of more affordable CPUs. Today we're going to cover them in compari...
Abstrakt: Today we'll focus on a pair of AMD's Trinity-based budget processors. Our summer review proved the FM1-based Athlon II X4 processors to be quite good. Now we're going to see if their counterparts can keep up. Testbeds Though the lowest-end FM1-based At...
Abstrakt: Benchmarking 86 CPUs takes a while. After long last, though, we have 51 models from AMD and 35 from Intel tested in our current suite. If you want to know how your processor sizes up to its competition, you'll find plenty of comparison data inside! 86 C...
Abstrakt: This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...
Two months ago when we tested the top desktop Bulldozer processor, we concluded that it turned out a big disappointment. The results of our today’s FX series testing, including lower-cost CPU modifications, didn’t change out opinion. Processors on Bul...
The AMD FX-4100 didn't top the charts when it comes to CPU performance, but the low price and solid overclocking results make it a decent chip for those looking for a budget system build....
Udgivet: 2011-11-07, Forfatter: Carl , anmeldelse af: HardCOREware.net
Due to issues with customs/logistics (no fault of AMD's), we're a bit late with our Bulldozer review. I suppose that is fitting in this case, but luckily, this gives us the chance to take a bit more time with the review, testing the Bulldozer CPU under it...
Abstrakt: The NAS Parallel Benchmarks from NASA were mixed, but generally the i3-2120 managed to outperform the FX-4100. CLOMP is used for measuring the OpenMP efficiency on multiple CPU cores. The FX-4100 did quite poorly for being a quad-core part and ev...
