Testseek.dk har samlet 76 ekspertanmeldelser af AMD A8-7600 65W 3.3GHz Socket FM2+ og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 76%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for AMD A8-7600 65W 3.3GHz Socket FM2+.
Februar 2014
(76%)
76 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse fra eksperter, der har anmeldt dette produkt.
Brugere
(60%)
1 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse af ejere af produktet.
76010076
Redaktørerne kunne lide
TEST
AMD A8-7600 APU
Hardware udlånt af
AMD
Skrevet af Michael den 1. Sep 2015. Testen er vist 3837 gange
Flere tests i kategorien Processor
Del med dine venner
Ì skrivende stund
Den 31. august 2015
Er AMD A8-7600 set med et prisskilt pålydende 7
Redaktørerne brød sig ikke om
Savner overclocking muligheder trods TDP indstillinger
TEST: AMD A8-7600 APU, Hardware udlånt af: AMD, Skrevet af Michael den 1. Sep 2015. Testen er vist 3837 gange, Flere tests i kategorien Processor, Del med dine venner, Ì skrivende stund, den 31. august 2015, er AMD A8-7600 set med et prisskilt pålydende 7
Savner overclocking muligheder trods TDP indstillinger
De kære små APU'er fra AMD har vi jo efterhånden testet et par stykker af, og de bliver altså ved med at få mig til at smile. De leverer en god allround ydeevne med en dedikeret R7 260X grafikchip, der gør, at vi også vil kunne spille nogle lette spil me...
Marknadsledande integrerade grafikdel, Kompetent plattform, Låg strömförbrukning vid vila
Oklar tillgänglighet och prisbild, Tappar prestanda vid färre trådar, Svårt att klara moderna spel i 1080p, Förhållandevis hög strömförbrukning vid CPUbelastning
Processorfamiljen Kaveri innebär den kanske största förändringen i AMD:s A-serie sedan lanseringen av Llano i mitten av 2011. Internt återfinns den arkitekturerna Steamroller för CPU-delen och Graphics Core Next för GPU, tillverkningen sker på en ny 2...
Abstrakt: Jos olet aikeissa ostaa uutta työpöytäkonetta, ja et ole täysin perillä nykyisestä tilanteesta työpöytäsuorittimien rintamalla, niin tämä on oikea artikkeli sinulle. Artikkelissa annamme suositukset työpöytäkoneiden suoritinvalintaan eri hintakategorioiss...
Abstrakt: AMD today introduced the new AMD A10-7800 and A8-7600 Accelerated Processing Units (APU) to the component channel. These processors are part of AMD's 4th Generation of APU's that are code named Kaveri. Kaveri is AMD's first processor that utilizes the Het...
The Kaveri A8-7600 with Radeon R7 on-die graphics is supposed to offer an attractive all-in-one solution for mainstream users. At $119 it is relatively affordable and it makes a lot of sense for casual gamers or home users. Sadly though, the A8-7600 is st...
Much better integrated-graphics performance than comparable Intel chips, CPU performance similar to that of previous-generation A10, while sipping a third less power
Comparably priced Intel Core i3 is faster in most typical CPU workloads, Fast RAM required for best gaming performance, HSA support currently limited
This midrange CPU/GPU delivers very good integrated graphics performance, and improved CPU performance, at a more reasonable price and power level than its A10-7850K "Kaveri" counterpart. It’s a good choice for budget gaming PCs, though comparable In...
Kaveri is another incremental improvement to AMD's mainstream desktop lineup. Efficiency is the watchword, both in terms of CPU clock cycles and power consumption. The A8-7600, despite having a modest clock speed of 3.1 or 3.3 GHz (depend on the TDP s...
Subjective impressions and conclusions As I said on the previous page, Battlefield 4's Mantle renderer is kind of a double-edged sword. That's true on Kaveri much as it is on the high-end, R9 290X-powerd system that Scott tested. The renderer's effect, in...
As the benchmarks have shown, AMD are still way off when it comes to CPU specific tasks. However, Kaveri was never really meant to compete with Intel's i5 or i7 processors and was aimed more at the casual gamer. In terms of gaming performance, Kaveri sho...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
(78%)
Udgivet: 2014-01-23, Forfatter: Steven , anmeldelse af: techspot.com
Kaveri's efficiency gains make it a wise choice over Richland while AMD's powerful integrated graphics and affordable pricing are enough to counter Intel's faster CPUs.
Relatively weak speed gains overall with a 10% clockforclock performance bump over Richland, while the older part actually came out on top more than we expected.
