Testseek.dk har samlet 17 ekspertanmeldelser af Pentax SMC-DA 35mm f/2.4 AL og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 52%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for Pentax SMC-DA 35mm f/2.4 AL.
(52%)
17 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse fra eksperter, der har anmeldt dette produkt.
Abstrakt: Pentax' billige 35 mm gør det rigtig godt, og specielt hvis du kan holde dig indenfor området F5.6-F11, får du en billedkvalitet, der matcher objektiver, der koster tre gange så meget.Pentax tilbyder to 35 mm-objektiver, hvoraf dette er det prismæssigt me...
Abstrakt: Pentax erbjuder två 35 mm-objektiv, varav detta är det prismässigt mest förnuftiga, som med litet god vilja kan kallas för en vidvinkel. Det är konstruerat främst i plast och är det enda av de tre Pentax-objektiven som inte har metallfattning, ......
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
-
Udgivet: 2015-10-01, Forfatter: Paul , anmeldelse af: dxomark.com
We've tested 21 different prime lenses, featuring “fast” f/2.8 or f/4 apertures, and wide-angle through to short telephoto focal lengths. There's a big range of scores on display, from a high of 25 points to a low of just 12 points, showing the importance...
A joy to use as it's so compact and lightweight, Excellent sharpness through corners, Excellent value, "first prime" for beginners, Very sharp with shallow DOF for near portraits, Beautiful circular highlight bokeh at F2.4, Renders very busy OOF
Unattractive highlight bokeh and starbursts, No QuickShift or focus distance markings, Loud, jarring screwdriven autofocus, Lens hood not included, no dedicated hood, Allplastic construction
and RatingWe have a confession to make. Our reviewer is used to higher end DA and even premium DA* and Limited level glass. As such, it could be very easy to dismiss this Plastic Fantastic as sub-par from a build quality stand point. We had to remind our...
Udgivet: 2014-01-30, Forfatter: Kevin , anmeldelse af: dxomark.com
Abstrakt: Although the Pentax K-5 II and K-5 IIs have now been replaced by the Pentax K-3, we've analyzed the two models with a range of lenses from both Pentax and third-party makers and thought the results would be of interest to our readers. The information is a...
Udgivet: 2014-01-30, Forfatter: Kevin , anmeldelse af: dxomark.com
Abstrakt: Although the Pentax K-5 II and K-5 IIs have now been replaced by the Pentax K-3, we've analyzed the two models with a range of lenses from both Pentax and third-party makers and thought the results would be of interest to our readers. The information is a...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
(36%)
Udgivet: 2014-01-07, Forfatter: Kevin , anmeldelse af: dxomark.com
Abstrakt: Continuing our series of evaluation of lens systems we've assessed a modest range of Pentax and third-party lenses for their optical quality on the firm's new flagship Pentax K-3 model. As the replacement for the K-5 II and K-5 IIs, the Pentax K-3 has a n...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
(44%)
Udgivet: 2014-01-06, Forfatter: Kevin , anmeldelse af: dxomark.com
Abstrakt: Continuing our series of evaluation of lens systems we've assessed a modest range of Pentax and third-party lenses for their optical quality on the firm's new flagship Pentax K-3 model. As the replacement for the K-5 II and K-5 IIs, the Pentax K-3 has a n...
Udgivet: 2013-08-22, Forfatter: Kevin , anmeldelse af: dxomark.com
Abstrakt: Announced in June this year, the K-50 is an accessibly priced environmentally sealed DSLR featuring a built-in stabilization and a 16-MPix APS-C size CMOS sensor. As Pentax has yet to introduce a full-frame DSLR to the range the K-50, like others before i...
small and compact construction, splendid image quality in the frame centre, decent image quality on the edge of the frame, slight chromatic aberration, low distortion, very low coma, negligible astigmatism, good transmission and work against bright light,
plastic casing and mount, noisy focusing mechanism, noticeable vignetting.
It is not easy to write a summary here. On the one hand I would like to praise this lens a lot. Such a good pros/cons ratio is a rare thing in this price segment and the flaws are definitely nothing serious; many pros are really important and of high cali...