Testseek.dk har samlet 38 ekspertanmeldelser af Nikon AF-S VR 70-200mm f/4G ED Nikkor og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 68%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for Nikon AF-S VR 70-200mm f/4G ED Nikkor .
(68%)
38 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse fra eksperter, der har anmeldt dette produkt.
Brugere
(98%)
42 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse af ejere af produktet.
68010038
Tester
side 2 af 4
Sorter efter:
Bedømmelse
Udgivet: 2014-01-31, Forfatter: Kevin , anmeldelse af: dxomark.com
Abstrakt: Following on the from the lens recommendations for the new mid-range DX format Nikon D5300, we've now completed the assessment of the full-frame Nikon Df. We've tested the camera with more than 90 Nikkor and third-party prime lenses and zooms to assess im...
Udgivet: 2014-01-16, Forfatter: Kevin , anmeldelse af: dxomark.com
Abstrakt: Following the lens recommendations for Nikon D7100 and entry-level D3200, we've now turned our attention to the new mid-range D5300. We've tested the camera with more than 140 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality. Read onto...
There is a lot to like about the Nikon 70-200mm ƒ/4G ED VR AF-S, not the least of which is its small profile and light weight. Nikon users have long looked at Canon with longing for a smaller version of the 70-200mm ƒ/2.8 workhorse. That time has now arri...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
(98%)
Udgivet: 2013-12-11, Forfatter: Kevin , anmeldelse af: dxomark.com
Abstrakt: We've now had the opportunity to assess the entry-level 24-Mpix Nikon D3200 with a wide range of lenses. We've analyzed a total of over 140 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality, and to discover which of those models perform...
Udgivet: 2013-11-21, Forfatter: Kevin , anmeldelse af: dxomark.com
Abstrakt: Following on from the lens recommendations for the earlier full-frame Nikon D600, we've now had the opportunity to assess a wide range lenses with that model's replacement, the 24-Mpix D610. We've analyzed a total of 95 Nikkor and third-party prime and zo...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
(54%)
Udgivet: 2013-10-24, Forfatter: Kevin , anmeldelse af: dxomark.com
Abstrakt: Following the recommendations for Nikon D7100, we've had the opportunity to assess another of the firm's 24-Mpix DX format cameras – the mid-range D5200 - with over 120 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality. Read onto find o...
Udgivet: 2013-10-10, Forfatter: Kevin , anmeldelse af: dxomark.com
Abstrakt: This is the third part in the series of our lens recommendations for the Nikon D7100 where we've analyzed nearly 46 Nikon and third-party telephoto prime and zoom models to assess their optical quality. Read onto find out which of these lenses are the bes...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
(42%)
Udgivet: 2013-10-02, Forfatter: Kevin , anmeldelse af: dxomark.com
Abstrakt: This is part one of our lens recommendations for the Nikon D7100 where we've tested over 120 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality. Read onto find out which of these lenses are perform best when paired with Nikon's 24M-Pix A...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
(42%)
Udgivet: 2013-07-15, Forfatter: Jim , anmeldelse af: pcmag.com
excellent image quality in the frame centre, good image quality on the edge of the frame, very good control of chromatic aberration, slight distortion on the APSC/DX detector, zero coma problems, negligible astigmatism, moderate vignetting, silent and acc
slight spherical aberration at 200 mm, work against bright light could have been better.
If you only compare the list of pros and cons you can already say that the Nikkor AF-S 70–200 mm f/4.0G ED VR is a very well-made lens indeed. The only thing that we don't like is its price. Recently it's dropped to a level below 5000 PLN but still it rem...
