Testseek.dk har samlet 25 ekspertanmeldelser af Fujifilm Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 86%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for Fujifilm Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR.
Februar 2018
(86%)
25 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse fra eksperter, der har anmeldt dette produkt.
Brugere
-
0 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse af ejere af produktet.
86010025
Redaktørerne kunne lide
Meget anvendelig zoom med solid byggekvalitet
Vejrtætning og velfungerende billedstabilisering. Billedkvaliteten er på niveau med – hvis ikke bedre end – tilsvarende objektiver fra Canon og Nikon
Fuji has produced an excellent lens with the XF 50-140mm: if you are a pro shooter looking for the 70-200mm range, you have probably already added this lens to your collection. Like most telephoto zooms, these pay for themselves quickly and become go-to l...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
-
Udgivet: 2015-09-01, Forfatter: Joe , anmeldelse af: shutterbug.com
Abstrakt: Fuji 50-140mm On A Fuji X-T1 Graphite Smaller To Bigger I remember back to what seems like an eternity ago to the early cell phones. I had a cell phone or more like a suitcase phone that I could carry in my briefcase. I always thought it couldn't get any...
solid and sealed casing made of metal, excellent image quality in the frame centre, good image on the edge of the frame, proper correction of the longitudinal chromatic aberration, negligible lateral chromatic aberration, no serious problems concerning sp
a bit too high astigmatism at 90 mm focal length, vignetting could have been a tad lower.
If the price of the Fujinon 50–140 mm was lower the summary of its test would consist of superlatives only – after all it is really a superb, practically flawless lens. I am sure anybody who buys it will be delighted with the quality of images it provides...
Price-wise this lens is targeted at the professional end of the market, although it will also appeal to well-heeled serious enthusiasts and represents a worthwhile long-term investment. Superior build quality with weatherproof sealing make this a versatil...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
Pris
(90%)
Udgivet: 2018-01-30, Forfatter: Michael , anmeldelse af: trustedreviews.com
Features optical image stabilisation, Rubberised focus ring, Precise aperture control in 1/3EV steps, Weather-resistant
Expensive compared to other macro lenses, Obvious hissing during operation, Not the fastest focusing prime lens in the Fujinon range, The barrel feels plasticky in areas
This long-overdue macro lens for Fujifilm's X-series is a highly capable performer – although a few quirks and its size makes it better suited to larger SLR-style camera bodies...
Abstrakt: Fujifilm is one of the first names of photography, with a history that stretches back nearly a century. Photographers who are old enough to have used analog cameras best know the brand's film stocks-it served as Kodak's biggest rival prior to the digital...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
Pris
(90%)
Udgivet: 2015-10-01, Forfatter: Arthur , anmeldelse af: focus-numerique.fr
Ouverture constante f/2,8, Stabilisation optique performante, Conception tout temps, Qualité de fabrication / prise en main, Qualité optique générale, Centre des images très piqué, Peu de vignetage, Peu de distorsions, Peu d'aberrations chromatiques
Poids et encombrement, Manque d'homogénéité entre le centre et les bords aux plus grandes ouvertures
Au final, nous recommandons sans trop d'hésitations cet objectif qui saura faire le bonheur des amateurs de photos d'action utilisant un boîtier Fujifilm. En même temps, ils n'ont pas vraiment le choix! Le Fujifilm Fujinon XF 50-140 mm f/2,8 R LM OIS WR s...
solidna, metalowa i uszczelniona obudowa, świetna jakość obrazu w centrum kadru, dobra jakość na brzegu kadru, prawidłowo korygowana podłużna aberracja chromatyczna, znikoma poprzeczna aberracja chromatyczna, brak poważnych problemów z aberracją sferyczną
trochę za duży astygmatyzm dla ogniskowej 90 mm, winietowanie mogłoby być odrobinę mniejsze
R E K L A M A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - tag. * * If you do not want to deal with the intricities of the noscript * section, delete the tag (from. to ). On * average, the noscript tag is called from less tha...
