Testseek.dk har samlet 26 ekspertanmeldelser af Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L 2 USM og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 63%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L 2 USM.
(63%)
26 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse fra eksperter, der har anmeldt dette produkt.
Abstrakt: Replacing Canon’s original 16–35mm f/2.8L of 2001, this full-frame ultrawide for pros ($1,450, street) has two UD glass elements to suppress chromatic aberrations, and three aspheric elements to minimize linear distortion. A 26–56mm equivalent on APS-C...
The Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 USM L II may not be the greatest lens around in absolute terms but it delivers regarding its primary purpose - a very good performance at its ultra-wide to wide settings (16-26mm) from about f/4 onwards. This isnt all that ...
Canons optical engineers say that the II version of the lens has improved corner sharpness. Ill have to take their word for it. Most viewers concentrate on whatever is in the center of an image. Readers who primarily photograph people will probably ...
Abstrakt: Based on our tests, the Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM is a solid lens offering in the ultra-wide category. It has a few issues with softness at certain apertures and focal lengths, a little chromatic aberration wide open, as well as some distortion and ...
Abstrakt: Let me save you from reading the rest of this review. If you have $1,500, want the best ultra-wide zoom on the planet for your Canon full-frame (5D, 1Ds Mk III, etc.) or 1.3x (1D Mk III) camera and dont mind a little extra size and weight, just get o...
The Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM covers an impressive wide-angle field of view at an f/2.8 aperture, a feat for a prime lens, and delivers the added convenience of a 2x zoom design....
Abstrakt: Zwar bleibt die Abschattung der Ränder minimal, doch Auflösung und Kontrast sacken zu den Ecken gewaltig ab. Optisch ist Canon EF 2,8/16–35 mm L II USM für Canon 7D nicht empfehlenswert und mit 1380 Euro dazu noch deutlich teurer als die Alternativen. ...
