Testseek.dk har samlet 125 ekspertanmeldelser af Asus RT-AC68U AC1900 802.11ac Router og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 88%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for Asus RT-AC68U AC1900 802.11ac Router.
December 2013
(88%)
125 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse fra eksperter, der har anmeldt dette produkt.
Brugere
(90%)
285 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse af ejere af produktet.
880100125
Redaktørerne kunne lide
Designet
Den ser rigtig fed ud med dens front Opsætningen
Rigtig nem at sætte op
Slet ingen problemmer USB tilslutninger
Rigitg fedt at der både er USB 2
0 og USB 3
0 til udstyr Rækkeviden
Den er jo ret imponerene Hastighederne
Man må sige at den ny
TEST
ASUS RP-AC68U
Hardware udlånt af
ASUS
Skrevet af Michael den 7. Mar 2016. Testen er vist 8671 gange
Abstrakt: If you're looking for an 802.11ac router with great range and throughput, Asus' RT- AC68U Dual-band Wireless-AC1900 Gigabit Router ($199.99) topped our tests on both measures. It's also got solid small business features and a highly polished interface. If...
Udgivet: 2014-07-28, Forfatter: Alex , anmeldelse af: tomsguide.com
Fast, Excellent throughput, Thoughtful design, Powerful firmware, Easy access to files away from home
Slow at 5 feet, Costly cloud sync
A sleek design and lightning-fast speeds make the ASUS RT-AC68U the premium Wi-Fi router to beat. ASUS' RT line of routers has developed a reputation for outstanding speeds and high quality, and the company has made significant improvements wi...
Abstrakt: It's been more than 18 months since the first 802.11ac routers hit the market, and the IEEE still hasn't approved the draft standard. If you think Congress moves slowly, you haven't been tracking the pace at which the IEEE has been considering the draft v...
The Asus RT-AC68U Dual-band Wireless-AC1900 Gigabit Router features powerful hardware, faster Wi-Fi technology, and useful features. The router delivers in all categories
The Asus RT-AC68U is expensive, not wall-mountable, and not everyone will immediately benefit from its new and faster Wi-Fi standards
For advanced and professional users, the Asus RT-AC68U Dual-band Wireless-AC1900 Gigabit Router is worth every penny thanks to its stellar performance, solid build, and bounty of useful features.
Udgivet: 2014-08-25, Forfatter: George , anmeldelse af: techradar.com/au/
Super fast transfers, Long range, Simple setup, 6 discrete WANs
Pricey, Feature overkill for most
The RT-AC68U's performance is well-documented, but the performance boost I saw over my previous everyday router – Linksys's E3200 – still surprised me. In scientific terms, I would call this device hella fast. A testament to Broadcom's new BCM4709 chipset...
The Asus RT-AC68U Dual-band Wireless-AC1900 Gigabit Router features powerful hardware, faster Wi-Fi technology, and useful features. The router delivers in all categories
The Asus RT-AC68U is expensive, not wall-mountable, and not everyone will immediately benefit from its new and faster Wi-Fi standards
For advanced and professional users, the Asus RT-AC68U Dual-band Wireless-AC1900 Gigabit Router is worth every penny thanks to its stellar performance, solid build, and bounty of useful features....
Abstrakt: With the wireless 820.11 wireless AC standard gaining popularity, ASUS has updated their flagship router and networking kit. The RT-AC68U and PCE-AC68 represent the pinnacle of modern wireless design....
Udgivet: 2018-08-10, Forfatter: David , anmeldelse af: uk.hardware.info
Abstrakt: One of the most common annoyances of modern man is a poorly functioning WiFi connection. Especially now that more and more devices are becoming connected and it only gets busier in the ether, it can do no harm to take a good look at your current equipment...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
Pris
-
Udgivet: 2018-02-09, Forfatter: Frank , anmeldelse af: uk.hardware.info
ASUS AiMesh offers a very interesting alternative for mesh systems such as its own Lyra but based on standard routers. We tested the special AiMesh firmware with two ASUS RT-AC86U routers. The results are very promising: the performance is far better than...