Testseek.dk har samlet 52 ekspertanmeldelser af Asustor AS-604T og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 84%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for Asustor AS-604T.
Maj 2013
(84%)
52 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse fra eksperter, der har anmeldt dette produkt.
Brugere
-
0 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse af ejere af produktet.
84010052
Redaktørerne kunne lide
Indbygget strømforsyning
Lækker kvalitet/finish
Stort udvalg af apps/services
Imponerende ydelse
RAM kan udvides
Dual Gigabit ethernet
Porte/udvidelsesmuligheder (eSATA
USB
HDMI…)
Ydelsen er helt i top!
Du vil mere eller mindre opnå de maksimalt tilladte hastigheder uanset hvilken RAID opsætning du vælger
Designet er smukt og innovativt
Nas serveren er udstyret med en lille skærm og tilhørende knapper
Hvor du kan navigere rundt
Byggekvalitet
Funktioner
USB på fronten
Betjening på fronten
Indbygget Boxee software til afspilning
Redaktørerne brød sig ikke om
Surveillance Center kan ikke tilgås via Mac
Begrænset udvalg af apps til smartphones og tablets
Ingen mulighed for dansk sprog i webinterface
Prisen vil nok skræmme mange private
Fra at erhverve sig denne nas server alene på grund af prisen
Unremarkable performance, No tool-free drive bays, UI a little dated, More expensive than closest rival
Asustor has produced a well-made, intuitive and reasonably fast four bay NAS but it doesn't excel in any particular area. Consequently while buyers are unlikely to be disappointed with their purchase we feel there are better options in this hotly conteste...
Udgivet: 2014-03-25, Forfatter: Andrew , anmeldelse af: macworld.co.uk
sturdy construction, accessible modern software interface, decent performance under certain conditions
very poor performance with small files, derivative design breaks no new ground
There's no denying the Asustor AS-604T is a very well featured and sturdily built NAS drive. Given its close facsimile to QNAP products, there's little reason to choose the newcomer – except perhaps for price. A comparable QNAP model could be the TS-469 w...
Udgivet: 2014-02-21, Forfatter: Andrew , anmeldelse af: techadvisor.co.uk
There's no denying the Asustor AS-604T is a very well featured and sturdily built NAS drive. Given its close facsimile to QNAP products, there appears to be little reason to choose the newcomer – except perhaps the issue of price. A comparable QNAP model...
Being a new name into a particular market segment is not always going to be easy for any vendor, but thankfully Asustor have got the association with Asus, who we all know are one of the biggest names in the motherboard and GPU sectors. Coming in with suc...
Udgivet: 2013-07-29, Forfatter: Stuart , anmeldelse af: hardwareheaven.com
If we start with the build quality of the AS-604T we have a NAS which has a solid metal chassis with a clean brushed finish. The front of the AS-604T has a sturdy quality to it, the mechanism for removing the drive cases from the bays for example, has a s...
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?
Pris
(90%)
Udgivet: 2013-05-13, Forfatter: Dave , anmeldelse af: alphr.com
Asustor makes a big splash in the NAS market with a low-cost, four-bay appliance packed with features...
Udgivet: 2013-02-18, Forfatter: Frank , anmeldelse af: uk.hardware.info
So, do Synology and QNAP finally have some fresh competition? We'd like to say yes. With the AS-604T NAS device, Asustor has created an outstanding first entry. The chassis is solid and attractive, the display is practical, and the firmware is very good...
The Asustor AS604 is an extremely powerful and versatile Network Attached Storage system Because the AS604 basically is a normal PC, the station provides more than enough performance to run even under full load and multiple client access at the same time...
Can be used as a media centre, Provides Hot Swappable functions, UserFriendly web interface
No dynamic expansions, Price
From what we have tested so far, the ASUSTOR AS-60T is generally good at everything while excelling at nothing. At its price range, users won't feel let down by its performance but there are better options within its range.(previously published in issue ...
