Testseek.dk har samlet 8 ekspertanmeldelser af Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 2.66GHz Socket 775 og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 88%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 2.66GHz Socket 775.
(88%)
8 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse fra eksperter, der har anmeldt dette produkt.
Abstrakt: Jeg var med til et Intel seminar for mange af de forhandlere som sælger Intel baseret systemer i deres virksomhed i efteråret 2007 og der blev jeg bekendt med den nye serie af Intel processorer som de lagde op til skulle komme her i starten af 2008 og...
Abstrakt: This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...
Weve deliberately published no comments on results of our old processors -- everything is clear. Indeed, Core 2 Duo E6600 used to be a cherished dream of many users, but now it can compete only with Pentium. However, its still competitive, even thou...
The best compromise is a 3.60GHz overclock; it does not take that much voltage and runs with 450MHz FSB. The problem with the E8000 series is availability. While E8400 are almost nowhere in stock - backorders in Europe are in the range of three to five...
As expected the newer 45nm Core 2 Duos delivered some added performance, which is twice the good news when you consider it basically comes free of charge. Although these new 45nm Core 2 Duo processors are yet to hit their target price, the E8200 and E...
Bei der momentanen Core2Duo Prozessor Situation könnte man meinen, Intel wolle den Planeten mit ihren Produkten zuschütten. Nach dem Motto: "Die Welt braucht mehr Chips", erscheinen die Modelle in verschiedenen Taktraten und FSB Zahlen fast in Q...
Rapide dans tous les cas de figure, Equivaut parfois à des quadcore entrée de gamme (AMD Phenom X4 9650 par exemple),
Pour la vidéo et la 3D, les quadcore sont (forcément) plus rapides
Un excellent processeur dual-core qui sait allier rapidité et consommation modérée. En revanche, on lui préfère un quad-core pour les encodages vidéos ou la réalisation de rendu 3D....
