Testseek.dk har samlet 422 ekspertanmeldelser af AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 85%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Marts 2017
(85%)
422 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse fra eksperter, der har anmeldt dette produkt.
Massive multi-core performance, Aggressive pricing, Smart calls on architecture, Energy efficient design, Gives users honest choice, Significant ecosystem support
Limited overclocking potential, Single-thread not as good as Intel, Gaming optimisations still needed
Before today, AMD had a difficult time convincing the enthusiast that it was worth going down its CPU route for their next build. Intel held sway through a combination of superior performance emanating from superior architectures.Today, however, the s...
Overall, then, the day has finally arrived that we thought would never come - a competitive CPU from AMD at the high end. There are some teething problems to get over, and don't expect as polished an experience as you would from an Intel Z270 system right...
Udgivet: 2017-03-02, Forfatter: Dave , anmeldelse af: pcgamesn.com
Abstrakt: AMD's Ryzen 7 1800X has finally been released, chucking eight cores and sixteen threads of processing power down the throats of a ravenous hardware crowd. The early reviews are in and… for us gamers the numbers do not look good.Chucking a new solid state...
Udgivet: 2017-03-02, Forfatter: Paul , anmeldelse af: tomshardware.co.uk
Low cost, Low TDP, Office and workstation applications
Subpar gaming performance in some titles, Poorly optimized software ecosystem
We would recommend Ryzen 7 1800X for desktop and heavy workloads, such as rendering and workstation applications, but it isn't as competitive with a diverse range of game titles. Ryzen sets a low pricing bar, and the addition of the new Zen microarchi...
Highly competitive multithreaded performance, Competes against Intel's top tier CPUs, Supplied with RGB Cooler, Fully featured platform, 8/16 cores threads priced lower than the competition, Significantly improved performance per watt, Smart technologies
Can be beat in memory intensive applications, Not quite as fast clock for clock, Specific memory requirements
There we have it, the tests are in and Ryzen 7 gives a great right hook to the Blue team. In highly threaded performance, the 1800X often falls right between the i7 6900K and the i7 6950X. Considering its launch price is £489/$499. In some results, the 18...
Udgivet: 2017-05-20, Forfatter: Jason , anmeldelse af: blackholetec.com
Wrapping things up, it's important to understand how the Ryzen 1800X is to be judged; the parameters for its evaluation. Price is one of the factors as is the processor performance, given its price-point. Apart from this one must not only judge the perfor...
Incredible multi-core performance, Great choice for video editing and image rendering applications, Easily overclockable, Competes with i7-6950X at half the price
Gaming performance could be better, Lacks in single core performance
AMD has delivered on most of its promises with the Ryzen, it seems. Though the gaming performance could use some improvement, let's not forget that these are very early tests and games are not yet optimized for the Ryzen processors. With DX 12, games are...
If these early impressions are anything to go by, AMD is back with an enormous bang. We still need to see how things go out in the real world, but we can easily say that fans should be elated and Intel should be worried. The Ryzen 7 1800X pretty much wipe...
52% IPC improvement, Unlocked SKU, Great price/performance ratio
Slightly lower single-threaded performance
AMD's Ryzen is definitely a notable moment for the PC industry. With AMD back in the game, Intel will now have to up its game and bring out CPUs which are again competitive. We honestly hope this sets off a new battle between the two giants from the Silic...
Abstrakt: Looking at Intel's 8c/8t Core i7-9700K, I thought having 8 cores and high clocks would be great, even with Hyper-threading disabled… and I couldn't be so wrong.I had to test again and again to make sure what I saw was correct and sure enough it is, at a...
