dk.testseek.com  

 
 
Søgning:   
 

Hjem » Computere » CPUere » AMD » AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Arbejder
Vent venligst...

  Ekspertanmeldelser    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.dk har samlet 348 ekspertanmeldelser af AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 88%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Pris: Editor’s Choice April 2017
April 2017
 
(88%)
348 Tester
Brugere
-
0 Tester
88 0 100 348

 

Tester

side 4 af 35
Sorter efter:
Bedømmelse
 
  Udgivet: 2017-04-12, Forfatter: Patrick , anmeldelse af: servethehome.com

  • Reading reviews at launch, there was a ton on the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X. AMD sampled many sites with the 1500X and 1600X so that they would, naturally, compare them to the Ryzen 7 line and Intel chips. One benefit we had was being able to buy our chips and te...

Læs hele anmeldelsen »
 
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?   
 
-
 
  Udgivet: 2017-04-11, anmeldelse af: Computerpoweruser.com

  • Abstrakt:  Last month we took the shrink wrap off the eight-core Ryzen 7 CPUs, and now it's the six-core Ryzen 5 1600X's turn to upend the sub $300 processor market.The Ryzen 5 1600X is based on the same Summit Ridge architecture in the Ryzen 7, and in an unpreceden...

 
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?   
 
(80%)
 
  Udgivet: 2017-04-11, Forfatter: stefan , anmeldelse af: madshrimps.be

  • For the mainstream Ryzen 5 series, AMD has prepared for its customers not one but two hexa-core SKUs: the Ryzen 5 1600X but also the Ryzen 5 1600. Ryzen 5 1600X does have the same operating frequencies as the flagship Ryzen 7 1800X model, which means a 3...

Læs hele anmeldelsen »
 
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?   
 
  Pris


-
 
  Udgivet: 2017-04-11, Forfatter: W1zzard , anmeldelse af: techpowerup.com

  • Convincingly beats the Core i5-7600K "Kaby Lake", Trades blows with costlier i7-7700K in some tests, Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack), Single-threaded performance improved over previous generation, Unlocked multiplier,
  • Gaming frame rates lower than competing Intel chips, High power draw, Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited, Setup complicated (memory, HPET, CCX, SMT, and power profile), Overclocking barely worth it, Requires optimized apps of which
  • The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X currently retails for $250. Convincingly beats the Core i5-7600K "Kaby Lake" Trades blows with costlier i7-7700K in some tests Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack) Single-threaded performance impro...

Læs hele anmeldelsen »
 
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?   
 
  Pris


(91%)
 
  Udgivet: 2017-04-11, Forfatter: Hassan , anmeldelse af: wccftech.com

  • Very Competitive Pricing (Both CPU and Board), Very Good Multi-tasking Performance (CPU), 14nm Process Allows For Cool and Efficient Operation (CPU), Platform Cost Low Compared To Intel's Offerings, 6 Core, 12 Threads In The Price Bracket of Non-Threaded
  • Gaming Performance Not On Par With Competition, Limited Overclocking Potential on Ryzen Processors, AM4 Motherboards Not Compatible With High Speed DDR4 DIMMs (yet), Not many applications optimized for Ryzen Processors, No integrated graphics across all R

Læs hele anmeldelsen »
 
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?   
 
-
 
  Udgivet: 2017-04-11, Forfatter: Paul , anmeldelse af: tomshardware.com

  • Strength in heavily threaded workloads, Superior pricetoperformance ratio for budget workstations, Unlocked ratio multiplier
  • High price relative to Core i57600K, Lower overclocking headroom
  • The Ryzen 5 1600X provides a tremendous price-to-performance ratio for budget workstations that rivals Intel's Broadwell-E offerings. Ryzen 5 also provides playable performance in most games, but it lags the Intel competition and doesn't have as much...

Læs hele anmeldelsen »
 
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?   
 
  Pris


-
 
  Udgivet: 2017-04-11, Forfatter: Ryan , anmeldelse af: pcper.com

  • When AMD launched the Ryzen 7 processors last month to a substantial amount of fanfare and pent up excitement, we already knew that the Ryzen 5 launch would be following close behind. While the Ryzen 7 lineup was meant to compete with the Intel Core i7 Ka...

Læs hele anmeldelsen »
 
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?   
 
-
 
  Udgivet: 2017-04-11, anmeldelse af: kotaku.com

  • Republished with permission from:Steven Walton is a writer at TechSpot. TechSpot is a computer technology publication serving PC enthusiasts, gamers and IT pros since 1998...

Læs hele anmeldelsen »
 
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?   
 
-
 
  Udgivet: 2017-04-11, Forfatter: Marco , anmeldelse af: hothardware.com

  • Strong Overall Performance, Up To 6-Cores / 12-Threads, Power Friendly, Aggressive Pricing
  • Performance Anomalies In A Few Benchmarks, Lack-Luster Overclocking In Early Stages
  • With that said, though lower-resolution game performance with non-optimized titles remains an issue for Ryzen, that situation is improving. A recent patch for Ashes of the Singularity doesn't put Ryzen on the same level as Intel's high-end processors, but...

Læs hele anmeldelsen »
 
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?   
 
(90%)
 
  Udgivet: 2017-04-11, Forfatter: Gordon , anmeldelse af: pcworld.com_techhive.com

  • Abstrakt:  AMD's $250 Ryzen 5 1600X is here to challenge Intel's quad-core, $250 Core i5-7600K for the honor of being “The People's CPU.” Everyone likes to read about expensive, gold-plated, $1,000 parts, but in the real world, most people can't or won't spend that...

Læs hele anmeldelsen »
 
Var denne anmeldelse nyttig?   
 
-
    side 4 af 35 « Forrige   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 35   Næste »  
 
Flere populære produkter fra samme kategori