Testseek.dk har samlet 212 ekspertanmeldelser af AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 3.8GHz Socket AM4 og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 90%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 3.8GHz Socket AM4.
Maj 2020
(90%)
212 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse fra eksperter, der har anmeldt dette produkt.
Brugere
-
0 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse af ejere af produktet.
900100212
Tester
side 2 af 22
Sorter efter:
Bedømmelse
Udgivet: 2020-06-22, Forfatter: Rob , anmeldelse af: techgage.com
Both the Ryzen 3 3100 and 3300X provide a lot of horsepower for the money, Lots of cache for ~$100 processor models, Zen 2 improvements bring great boosts to many workloads, especially Adobe Lightroom
Ryzen 3 3100's internal design impacts performance vs 3300X, making the $20 premium seem like a nobrainer
It's sometimes just as much fun to take a look at budget gear as it can be top-end kit, something these new Ryzen 3 chips prove in spades. In some ways, we can't believe how much power can be had for such an affordable price nowadays. Ryzen's introduction...
Udgivet: 2020-06-12, Forfatter: Michael , anmeldelse af: phoronix.com
Abstrakt: Following our Intel Core i5 10600K and Core i9 10900K Linux benchmarks, here is a look at the lowest-end Core "Comet Lake" processor in the form of the Core i3 10100. Thanks to the increased pressure from AMD Ryzen, Intel now has a 4 core / 8 thread Core...
Udgivet: 2020-06-05, Forfatter: Tom , anmeldelse af: modders-inc.com
The Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 3 3300x CPUs round out the Ryzen 3000 series from AMD. I've had the opportunity to test most of the Ryzen 3000 series from AMD and I'm still amazed how closely they perform to each other. When looking at “office” type applicatio...
Udgivet: 2020-05-19, Forfatter: Sebastian , anmeldelse af: notebookcheck.net
4 cores with SMT, good system performance, price-performance ratio, PCI Express 4.0 support, good overclocking potential, suitable for small systems
higher energy demand in idle usage than with the competition
A lot of performance for a small priceWith the new Ryzen 3, AMD shows once again what's possible with Zen2. Compared to the previous generation based on Zen+, the performance could be increased significantly. In addition, Intel became increasingly unde...
We've been running the new 3rd Generation AMD Ryzen 3 processors for a number of weeks now and they still manage to impress us. The focus of this article was to look at 1080P gaming performance on a decent number of game titles. Right around 3.8 million p...
Udgivet: 2020-05-08, Forfatter: Dr. , anmeldelse af: techarp.com
Abstrakt: The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is more than just a slightly amped version of the Ryzen 3 3100. And it is quite the bargain at $120!Find out why we gave this new AMD Ryzen 3 processor our Editor's Choice Award!Let's start with the official AMD Ryzen 3 3300X tech br...
Udgivet: 2020-05-08, Forfatter: Steven , anmeldelse af: techspot.com
Abstrakt: The latest Ryzen processors from AMD are coming in as low as $100 with quad-cores and SMT support.Meet the new Ryzen 3 3100, set to cost just $100, it features 4 cores, 8 threads and clocks between 3.6 and 3.9 GHz depending on the workload. For such an...
Udgivet: 2020-05-08, Forfatter: Paul , anmeldelse af: tomshardware.com
Abstrakt: The Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 3 3100 show how much the AMD vs. Intel CPU landscape has changed since AMD's Zen first arrived three years ago. At the time, the mainstream desktop had been stuck at four cores for a decade, and Intel's market-leading $350 Core...
Udgivet: 2020-05-07, Forfatter: Sebastian , anmeldelse af: pcper.com
Clearly, AMD's new Ryzen 3 3100 and 3300X offer outstanding performance. When factoring in their expected retail prices, it becomes rather incredible. AMD continues to build on their impressive Zen 2 desktop portfolio, and these will be the chips to beat...
The AMD Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 3 3300X are both impressive entry-level 3rd Gen Ryzen processors. Having SMT enabled allow them to excel at multi-threaded workloads better than any processor ever has at these price points. They easily performed better than...
