Testseek.dk har samlet 270 ekspertanmeldelser af AMD Ryzen 3 1300X 3.5GHz Socket AM4 og den gennemsnitlige bedømmelse er 81%. Rul ned og se alle anmeldelser for AMD Ryzen 3 1300X 3.5GHz Socket AM4.
Juli 2017
(81%)
270 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse fra eksperter, der har anmeldt dette produkt.
Brugere
-
0 Tester
Gennemsnitlig bedømmelse af ejere af produktet.
810100270
Tester
side 6 af 27
Sorter efter:
Bedømmelse
Udgivet: 2017-07-27, Forfatter: Peter , anmeldelse af: eteknix.com
Fiercely competitive pricing for quad-core CPU, Robust gaming performance, Good day-to-day performance, Very easy to overclock, Doesn’t use a lot of power, Easy to keep cool,
None, “One of the most affordable Ryzen chip we’ve tested to date is also one of the most exciting. If you’re looking for competitive quad-core performance on a budget, you’ll be blown away with what the 1300X has to offer.”, AMD Ryzen 3 1300X Quad-Core C
If you're building a gaming system or office rig on a tighter budget, this is a good fit for the job. Even if you're building a smaller HTPC, or spare gaming rig, it seems like a good “project” CPU and I think it's going to have big appeal. For me, the Ry...
The introduction of a couple of Ryzen 3 processors provides PC enthusiasts with the opportunity of buying into the latest Zen architecture from as little as £100, with AMD targetting the £500-£750 base-unit market through a combination of these chips alli...
Low platform cost, Easy to overclock, Sense MI technologies, Very low thermal output, Great for gamers, Competitive mainstream performance, Neutral, - No RGB Wraith cooler (Why not make them more accessible AMD?), - Same power envelope as Ryzen 7
iGPU
In our testing, Ryzen 3 has thrown up some dramatically interesting results, and when you consider the updates and optimisations AMD has made since the release of the Ryzen family, it is understandable. Price to compete against the i3 7300 and the i3 7100...
AMD's Ryzen 3 1300X sets a new benchmark for the budget market with four physical cores, unlocked multipliers, and excellent bundled coolers. All of this comes at a lower price point than Intel's competing models. Support for overclocking on inexpensive S...
AMD's two new Ryzen chips are cheaper than their Intel rivals while offering better multi-threaded performance, comparable power consumption and a little more speed in tough gaming scenarios. Intel's chip is better in single-threaded tasks, but I'd still...
While the numbers are impressive, gaming performance of Ryzen processors still leaves a lot to be desired. Not to mention that not all games have been optimized for the Ryzen processors and DX 12, which can lead to better utilization of multiple CPU cores...
Four physical cores, Efficient AMD Zen architecture, Cooler included
No integrated graphics
AMD has been most relevant in the budget market for the past several years. This is where it retreated to when it couldn't keep up with Intel's advances, and it actually did fairly well by cutting prices and repositioning its formerly-high-end products. A...
Abstrakt: I remember the day when I got my first computer and it had an AMD Sempron processor in it, the first thing on my mind was whats an AMD and why is it not an Intel processor. This was the time that Intel held on to the lead so strong that they held on to it...
To sum it up, the AMD Ryzen 3 1300X is a phenomenal processor that outperforms the Intel Core i5-7400 on synthetic benchmarks and is on par when it comes to real-world tests, in this case video rendering on Adobe Premiere Pro. The AMD Ryzen 3 1200 on the...
Excellent price, Decent performance, Unlocked multiplier, Includes latest I/O features
Single threaded performance still outclassed by Intel, Optimization still on the way from most devs
Prev Next8.8Viable alternativePerformance 8.5Functionality 8.8Value 9.2ProsExcellent priceDecent performanceUnlocked multiplierIncludes latest I/O featuresConsSingle threaded performance still outclassed by IntelOptimization still on the way from most dev...
